If you advise someone who works for an Israeli company, or for the Israeli subsidiary of a company you look after, sooner or later a grant letter referring to "Section 102" and a trustee will land on your desk. It has no clean analogue in most tax systems. The instinct to map it onto whatever your jurisdiction calls a qualified plan is exactly where the trouble starts. Here is how it actually works.
If you take away just one thing, let it be this: Israel generally taxes Section 102 equity when the shares are sold, not when they vest. Almost everywhere else taxes RSUs on vest. That means two countries, the same shares, and different tax years - leaving you with a credit that often has nothing to offset.
Why Section 102 surprises foreign advisors
Section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance governs equity an employer grants to its employees - options (ESOP), restricted stock units (RSUs), and discounted employee stock purchase plans (ESPP). The instruments themselves are familiar. What makes the regime unusual is that the favourable tax treatment is delivered through a trustee holding the securities, and that qualifying changes both the tax rate and the timing of the charge.
Advisors who read the grant letter as an Israeli version of an incentive stock option tend to get the rate roughly right but the timing badly wrong. And the timing is what costs your client money.
The trustee capital-gains track
Under the capital-gains track, the employee's gain is taxed at the capital-gains rate of 25% rather than at marginal rates as employment income. This is subject to conditions. The central requirement is that an approved trustee holds the securities for a lock-up of at least 24 months from the date of grant and deposit. The alternative is the ordinary-income track, which taxes the gain as employment income at the employee's marginal rate.
Meeting these conditions determines the rate. This is not an election your client makes at sale. It is a function of how the plan was structured, which track the company elected, and whether the trustee holding period was actually respected.
| Capital-gains track with trustee | Employment-income track with trustee | No trustee | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax rate | 25% capital gains. For shares listed on a stock exchange, the part up to the 30-trading-day average before grant is employment income | Marginal rate, as employment income | Unlisted option - marginal rate on the whole gain. Share or listed option - marginal rate on its value at grant, later growth as capital gain |
| When tax is due | When the trustee sells the share or transfers it to the employee, whichever is earlier | When the trustee sells the share or transfers it to the employee, whichever is earlier | Unlisted option - on sale of the share. Share or listed option - at grant, and again on sale |
| Lock-up (blocking period) | 24 months from grant and deposit with the trustee | 12 months from grant and deposit with the trustee | None |
| Sale before the lock-up ends | The whole gain is taxed as employment income | No change - employment income | Not relevant |
The company elects the track, which will appear in the grant letter. Note that Section 102 does not apply to a controlling shareholder.
A quick note on rates: where an employee's total income (salary plus equity proceeds) exceeds the statutory threshold, the effective rate on the shares in 2026 can reach roughly 30% - comprising a 25% base rate, a 3% surtax, and a 2% capital-gains levy.
Sale, not vesting: the timing mismatch
This is the heart of the matter. Under the Section 102 trustee track, the Israeli tax event is generally deferred until the shares are sold or released from the trustee - not when they vest. For options, the tax event is deferred past exercise until the sale of the underlying share.
Most tax systems do the exact opposite with RSUs: income is recognised, withheld, and reported on vest. Consider an employee who vests while resident in your jurisdiction and sells three years later while resident in Israel, or vice versa. One country has already taxed the income in year one. The other taxes it in year four. Both countries may be entirely correct under their own domestic rules.
A foreign tax credit is designed to relieve double taxation on the same income in the same period. When two countries disagree on when the income arose, there can be nothing to credit against in either year. That is not an edge case - it is the standard result of a cross-border move with unsold equity.
Employment income vs capital gain
Assuming the equity was granted under the trustee capital-gains track, the tax event is deferred to realisation for both RSUs and options. From there, the classification depends on whether the shares are listed on a stock exchange:
- Shares not listed on a stock exchange - the entire gain at realisation is generally treated as capital gain.
- Shares listed on a stock exchange (in Israel or abroad) - the "benefit element" at grant is treated as employment income. This is the difference between the average share price over the 30 trading days before the grant and the exercise price. Only the appreciation from that point to sale is taxed as a capital gain.
For an advisor preparing a foreign return, this split really matters. The employment-income slice and the capital-gains slice may be sourced, timed, and credited quite differently in your jurisdiction.
Client holding Israeli equity?
I act as Israeli counsel alongside advisors abroad - you keep the client, I take the Israeli part of the file.
For foreign advisorsLeaving Israel with RSUs or Section 102 options? How I can help »
Leaving Israel: exit tax
When an employee ceases to be an Israeli tax resident, section 100A imposes an exit tax. Assets - including unexercised options and unvested RSUs - are deemed to have been sold on the day before residency ends. Meanwhile, the employee's new country of residence will usually want to tax the full gain when it is actually realised. Most tax treaties do not fully resolve this overlap.
The timing of realisation relative to the timing of your client's severance is therefore critical. This is a decision that must be made before the move. Afterwards, the planning options narrow sharply.
Coming to Israel: Circular 9/2025
Consider the mirror-image scenario: your client received equity from a foreign employer while working abroad, outside Section 102, and is now moving to Israel as a new oleh or a returning resident. Israel Tax Authority Circular 9/2025 sets out, for the first time, a coherent framework for how that equity is taxed here.
The circular splits the income by residency. For an ordinary returning resident, or someone returning after fewer than six years, the income can be spread over the tax years from grant to exercise (up to six years). The portion allocated to the foreign-residency years is exempt, the rest is taxable, and a partial foreign tax credit may be available. For a new oleh or a veteran returning resident, the exemption is broader: only the portion reflecting Israeli workdays during the vesting period is taxable. If your client's vesting schedule straddles the move, this split is worth real money and depends on records they might not think to keep.
Related: Israeli tax for new olim - the ten-year exemption and what it does not cover »
Where the foreign tax credit breaks
A credit may be available in Israel for foreign tax paid on the same income, subject to the credit rules and the applicable treaty. But I will be direct about the limits: a treaty does not resolve every double-taxation scenario, and the equity timing mismatch is exactly the kind of problem it handles least well.
What actually works is coordinating the two tax systems deliberately. You must decide when to realise the equity, and in which residency year, with clear sight of both sets of rules at once. That normally means advisors on both sides talking before the event, rather than trying to reconcile things after the fact.
There is also a recurring point regarding refunds. A trustee or employer may withhold Israeli tax at the maximum rate upon realisation, even if the actual liability is lower due to part-year employment, an available foreign tax credit, or the apportionment mentioned above. Where this happens, you can file a return to reclaim the excess.
If you take just one action, make it this: before your client exercises, sells, or moves, find out which Section 102 track their plan uses and exactly when the trustee holding period started. Those two facts dictate most of the Israeli tax answer.
